推 wcontainer: 我還以為是SIGMA、TAMRON.. 09/21 12:17
→ wcontainer: 而且這裡面有幾隻也都很難找了 09/21 12:18
推 lifemusic: 有用過無IS USM 的 24/2.8 還不差 就AF聲大了點 XD 09/21 18:01
推 pcshsky1201: 手邊有一支100-300 USM, 超利超好用XD 09/27 19:19
Old, Inexpensive, and Tack-Sharp: Canon’s Best Lenses You Don’t Know About
http://petapixel.com/2014/09/18/old-inex
pensive-and-tack-sharp-canons-best-lense
s-you-dont-know-about/
http://tinyurl.com/okdqmuj
First, a disclaimer: most of these lenses, while very good quality, are still
below L glass. Modern advancements have made amazing improvements in lens
technology, which is to be expected. However, if you can’t afford a $1,000
lens, you can’t beat the value these lenses provide.
這些鏡頭雖然比不上L鏡以及最新的鏡頭
但如果你花不起一千美元去買,妳應該不會拒絕這些鏡頭的價格
28–80 f/3.5–5.6 USM
70–210 f/3.5–4.5 USM
100–300 f/5.6 L
100–300 f/4.5–5.6 USM
24mm f/2.8
28–70 f/3.5–4.5 II
這文的結論很有意思:
If you can’t afford an L lens yet, don’t just look for the cheapest option
Canon currently offers. If you’re willing to buy a used lens, you can get
L-like image quality for a fraction of the price. The quality you can find in
these lenses for under $100 is astounding. So don’t limit yourself if you can
’t afford an L.
--
試用一句話描述老皮：(A)帥啊老皮 (B)猴腮雷啊 (C)皮卡皮卡
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 130.166.94.78
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1411271991.A.65D.html