作者dale (他們叫我阿跌)
看板poetry
標題Re: [討論] found poetry
時間Thu Sep 30 12:01:59 2010
※ 引述《spacedunce5 (CJ)》之銘言:
: so my question is: do you think found poetry should seriously be considered
: poetry?
: (related question: how about prose poetry?)
To start things off: I think all arts are creative efforts
by means of limitation.
You must have limits to create boundaries; boundaries to
create definition -- and definition, which is devised and
provoked and exploited, to create a self-containing world,
i.e., poetry.
Found poetry is masonry with a deliberately diminutive set
of lexicon. Whether this deliberation a product of reasons
or whim is debatable, and I suppose its "seriousness" is
inevitably related to its cause; but it is masonry. There
are elements of creation here.
As far as credits are due though, I think "found poets"
deserve no more kudos than that of Enter key-pressers.
I don't see how prose poetry is related to found poetry, if
only by how sparingly linebreaks are used. Linebreaks are
choices made to lure and distract attentions; the lack of
which are still choices made.
--
╭─────────────────╮╭──────╮╭─╮
│
世界正崩毀離析,時間正傾倒頹壞。 ├┴╮ ╭┴┤ │
╰─┬───────────────╯ ├────┤ ╰┬╯
╰─────────────────╯ ╰──╯
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.211.184
推 celestial09:推 dale 精闢見解 ^^220.130.185.239 09/30 15:11
→ spacedunce5:thnx 4 your thoughts! i brought up 61.228.82.26 09/30 20:00
→ spacedunce5:prose poetry because it was on my 61.228.82.26 09/30 20:00
→ spacedunce5:mind, not in connection. 61.228.82.26 09/30 20:01
推 Chiwaku:拜/ 118.168.86.139 09/30 22:54
推 darksign:your words are so pretty D: 74.64.46.185 10/12 12:05