推 neofatty:你有在上班嗎 09/19 04:30
推 TripleC:其實想想，應該每場賽後都用機器來review裁判的每一球判決 09/19 09:36
→ TripleC:要是太不consistent的裁判就可以下放了... 09/19 09:37
推 cherubim:主場變形好球帶?! 09/19 14:23
推 mjhsieh:粉味球場被人用原子彈炸掉是最好了 09/20 17:56
→ AlexRodPOWER:你們支持天使的都是矮子嗎? 10/18 19:39
其實昨天另一則新聞.....
也很機車...
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-angels-fuentes18-2009sep18,0,7327485.story
就是在說瞎和Fuentes嗆了那兩句話後....
裁判組要調查他們的談話並威脅可能要對他們兩個人罰款.....
很鳥...
至於那個紅襪裁判本身的說詞則是如下.....
"I saw the strike zone," Reed said of the pitch to Green, referring to the
telestrator box used on television replays. "That said it was a strike -- it
was a pitch I thought was borderline. The catcher did a nice job of bringing
it up, and that was a telling blow. If a catcher moves his glove, it's to
improve the pitch.
"I called a [strike] earlier in the game that I thought was low, and I said,
'I'm not going to let that happen again.' I wish they were all waist-high.
They'd be a lot easier to judge."
修正好球帶我沒什麼意見....
不過這段話配合下面的圖...
我只想問,整場天使至少同一顆球判了五次....
結果最後一局紅襪打擊才會想到要修正?
太扯了吧?
※ 引述《tunababy (相信妳自己,真的....)》之銘言：
: OC整理了圖出來...
: http://0rz.tw/TWMBP
: http://0rz.tw/xCbSc
: OC難得讓我覺得報導內容大勝LAtimes...
: Latimes今天還在搞那種各打50大板的遊戲......
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 149.142.103.104