[情報] 人類學史文章闕漏

[hegemonic (做人要眼光放亮)]

本週四(6/8)人類學史下所要閱讀的 "On Ethnographic Authority"
因為所印講義的下緣有闕漏, 故在此登出, 請同學補上

p.28
photographs of the ethnographer's tent pitched among Kiriwinian dwellings.
The sharpest methodological justification for the new mode is to be

p.29
(另起一段)
    In the 1920s the new fieldworker-theorist brought to completion a

p.30
Lowie(1940), writing from the older Boasian tradition, more philological
in its orientation. But his was a rear-guard action; the point had been

p.31
(另起一段)
    Sixth, the wholes thus represented tended to be synchronic, prod-(ucts)

p.32
(另起一段)
    in The Nuer Evans-Pritchard makes strong claims for the power of

p.33
was and remains contested. Yet by their deployment in different combi-(nations)

p.36
given his extremely long field experience and profound cultivation of a

p.37
tion, in the power of rapport, empathy, and so on--have come under

p.38
in its englobing reality. A familiar mode of authority is generated that

p.42
(註釋)2. (Favret-Saada) and Contreras 1981.

p.50
a domesticated heteroglossia. Ethnographic discourses are not, in any

p.51
"theory of disease" that is transcribed and translated, at two separate

p.52
(1977:146, 148). The writing of ethnography, and unruly, multisubjective

有一些可能只是邊緣稍微削到, 不過我仍然重新po在上面
如果有看不懂或者覺得抄實在太麻煩的同學
我會印一份完整版放在助教室外抽屜, 讓大家自行影印

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 218.166.45.113
→ yayarattib:辛苦了