Re: [心得] 倫敦大戰：意料之中的失望

[wing2000 (天空中的星塵)]

※ 引述《changyg (Bob)》之銘言：
: Chelsea thoughts: Disappointed but not surprised
: by GilbertoSilver
: Guunerblog http://gunnerblog.com/?p=2576
: ＊＊＊＊＊這篇心得是 GilbertoSilver 撰寫的＊＊＊＊＊
: A couple of seasons back, I characterised Arsenal - Chelsea games of recent
: years as being comparable to this video clip:
: 連續兩個賽季以來, 我想 Arsenal vs Chelsea 的賽事可以比做以下的影片節錄：
: Capoeira vs Boxing (巴西武術 vs 拳擊)
: http://youtu.be/2g5t0s_Fn9s
: (有暗諷 槍手 缺少關鍵一擊，卻總是在華麗球風大作文章(￣□￣|||)a)
: What’s disappointing, I suppose, is how little that has changed.  There was
: even a predictability about the identity of the man delivering the knockout
: blow: one Didier Drogba.
: 我想，最失望的是，連扳回劣勢的機會都沒有。大家都有預感，認為會揮出 KO 重擊的人
: 就是 Didier Drogba。
: Arsene Wenger, among other pundits, has suggested that Arsenal had an “
: outstanding game”.  And yet there’s nothing unfortunate about our defeat.
:  This has happened too many times to be merely ‘unlucky’.  Yes, we had
: plenty of possession, but Chelsea probably knew it would be that way.  They
: knew if they sat deep, defended tight and narrow, that they could win the
: match by being better in both penalty areas.  Their centre-backs just about
: had the measure of Marouane Chamakh, whilst we have never been, and probably
: will never be, able to cope with the threat of Drogba, who now has 13 in 13
: against us.
: Arsene Wenger 仍在許多的評論家之中，仍指出 Arsenal 踢了一場“傑出的比賽”。我
: 們輸的比賽其實無關運氣，反倒是有太多機會而不該用“不幸”來概括之。是的，我們有
: 較高的控球權，Chelsea 也認定我們會如此。他們只要深撤後防，緊盯球員並侷限傳球路
: 徑，接著就靠較佳的鋒線球員和後衛在兩邊禁區的優勢贏下比賽即可。他們的中後衛只要
: 搞定 Chamakh 即可，而我們未曾，或者該說根本就不能搞定 Drogba 的威脅，一個至今
: 和我們對上 13 次的前鋒。
: There is a lot of talk about us needing to take our chances.  The finger of
: blame is pointed at Laurent Koscielny, who failed to head home our most
: presentable chance in the game’s opening moments.  It was a poor miss, but
: in isolation it didn’t represent the difference between the two teams.  It’
: s not as if taking the lead in the game would somehow have prevented the
: defensive sloppiness that allowed Chelsea not only to score twice but miss
: more enticing opportunities.  The gap could have been wider: Nicolas Anelka
: slotted wide when scoring seemed simpler, and Fabianski twice saved from
: one-on-one situations.
: 接著，我們來談談所需要的是把握機會。最令人髮指的便是：Laurent Koscielny，居然
: 在開局之刻最有機會的進球給它放槍。雖然浪費了那記進球，還未能明顯地顯出兩隊的差
: 異。就算領先一顆進球，也改變不了後防的凌亂讓 Chelsea 不只進了兩球，還送我們好
: 幾次的放槍大禮。漸漸地差異愈來愈大：Nicolas Anelka 在第一記進球時由邊路插上助
: 攻，即使這進球看起來很普通；接著 Fabianski 還救了兩次單刀的情形。
: Yes, Koscielny should have scored, but I’m not going to blame a centre-back
: for the ‘nil’ next to our name.  What Arsenal need to do is make their
: keep-ball strategy more efficient.  Arsene is reportedly obsessed by stats,
: and has sat in press conferences before defending defeats on the grounds of
: our possession percentage.  It means nothing, however, if it’s not converted
: in to goals.  A better team - a team like Chelsea - can let the other side
: have the ball in the knowledge that they can go from winning it back to
: scoring a goal in a matter of seconds.  You don’t need a twenty pass move
: when you can score with three.
: 沒錯，Koscielny 應該進球的，但我接下來不會批評一個中後衛只因為"零"在隊名裡面
: (Arsenal 意即兵工廠、軍火庫，理應名符其實地進球，但作者故意調侃，把"nil"原意為
: 零放在隊名裡，即 Arsenil ，酸球隊不會把握進球)。Arsenal 所需要的是，讓控球策略
: 更有效率一點。Arsene 似乎為數據給著魔了，於是在記者會以控球比率來掩飾輸球的事
: 實。但，控球再好，不能促成進球得分就是沒有意義的。好的球隊，就像 Chelsea，可以
: 讓敵隊一直控球，以為接下來就能夠進球並贏回比賽。我要強調的是，只要能兩三下的傳
: 球便可得分，就不要在那裏弄個二、三十次的傳球。
: The same applies to set pieces too.  If you’re a team with a lot of approach
: play down the flanks, it is inevitable you will win a lot of corners.  So
: work on them.  Create varied and dangerous routines.  Yesterday, Arsenal had
: ten corners.  Only one provided any serious threat.
: 同樣在定位球也一樣。若是球隊常以兩翼進攻，無疑地會拿到多次的角球機會。我要說，
: 好好地加強兩翼進攻，創造多樣且具威脅的路徑吧。昨天 Arsenal 就有十次的角球機會
: ，哪怕是只有一次(只要應用上述原則，)都能帶給對方不小的威脅。
: This general inefficiency is why I’m a declared fan of Andrey Arshavin.
:  Yes, he gives the ball away more than any other player in our side, but he’
: s also, in the absence of the much-missed Cesc Fabregas, the most productive
: in the final third.  Yesterday, he produced two stinging efforts which
: brought the best out of Petr Cech, from nothing.
: 因著球隊欠缺效率的通病之故，使得我成為 Andrey Arshavin 的頭號粉絲。沒錯，槍手
: 中他常常掉球，但卻也是，在我們最想念的 Cesc Fabregas 缺席之下，最有效率的第三
: 名球員。昨天，他製造兩次進球的威脅讓無所事事的 Petr Cech 不得不認真起來。
: Of course you can only use those kind of rapier counter-attacks if you can
: defend.  The Arsenal of 97/98 had the likes of Adams and Keown to hold the
: fort whilst Nicolas Anelka sprung the offside trap to clinical effect.  The
: Invincibles had a back four including Sol Campbell in his prime and protected
: by Vieira and Gilberto, two masters of their trade.  This side does not have
: a good enough defence to play in that way.  We have to control the game using
: keep-ball and create chances against tight, packed defences.  Against almost
: every side in the Premier League, that’s good enough.  But not Chelsea.
: 當然，你可以使用更快速的防守反擊，只要你有足夠的防守能力。97/98 的 Arsenal 有
: Adams 和 Keown 把守著最後防線，即使 Nicolas Anelka 穿越了越位陷阱也未必有機會
: 得分。當時的“無敵後防”由四名後衛組成，其中有一位是年輕的 Sol Campbell，而且
: 還有著大師級的後腰：Vieira 和 Gilberto。現在的陣容防禦能力不足以像當年那樣可以
: 踢防守反擊。我們得藉由持球權來掌控比賽，並創造機會來突破對方緊縮的防禦陣型。對
: 英超大部分的球隊是可行的，但 Chelsea 例外。
: There’s no shame in losing this game.  When you go away to the Champions,
: there’s a significant chance you will get beat.  This result is only a
: problem in the context of others.  Had we beaten West Brom, we’d be just
: four points off the top as opposed to seven, and table would make much
: prettier reading.
: 輸了這場沒有什麼可恥的。當你要遠征歐冠時，會有更多的機會被擊敗。這次賽果只是另
: 一種情境的困擾。當我們敗給 West Brom 時，距榜首僅是 4分之差，現在卻變成 7分之差
: ，積分榜也更顯得一目了然。
: Already, just seven games in to the season, there’s little margin for error.
:  Crucially, we need to start beating the bigger teams.  If we are to provide
: a serious threat in the league this season, I’d suggest we will have to beat
: both United and Chelsea - and possibly City - at the Emirates.
: 雖說才不過是開季的前七場比賽而已，但不該容許有犯錯的餘地。更殘酷的是，我們還得
: 擊敗更強的球隊。若我們還想奪冠的話，我認為我們必須在主場擊敗 ManUtd 和 Chelsea
: ，甚至 ManCity。
: International breaks always get me down.  Going in to one on the back of two
: defeats is particularly depressing.  Happy Monday this ain’t.
: 另外，國際比賽總是令我失望。兩場輸球的賽事更叫人沮喪。即使是憂鬱星期一，還是祝
: 大家星期一快樂。
: ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
: 看了視頻以後，
: http://www.soccerclips.net/videos/chelsea-v-arsenal-motd-highlights-20101
: 才深覺得 Arsenal 尚有很大的進步空間。
: 只要碰到輸球，
: 不外乎那幾個老調重彈的議題：
: 傷病問題、(光是休養球員就能組成明星槍手隊 XD)
: 門將問題、(被進得莫名奇妙)
: 後防問題、(當前的後防居然是今夏才買來趕上工的?!)
: 中場問題、(少了F4，常常會找不到核心組織)
: 前鋒問題、(很幸運我們有強壯又健康的C29、有效率但體力有限的A23)
: 還有，每年都會碰到的：
: 30歲以上，一年一簽(有找工作經驗的，都不會想當短期約聘人員，寧可做久一點的正職)
: 但還是那句話：
: 只有真正的槍迷，無論成績好壞，癡心不改！
: (我太喜歡這句話啦 (￣▽￣＃)﹏﹏)
: Goal! Goal! Arsenal!
: We r the Champions !

  這篇說得很好
  將戰術重點都說出來
  眾觀全場比賽
  總體而言,個人認為表現不過不失,勝負只是結果,過程卻看到大家的併勁
  當中最大的缺點有
  1,法比有一次嚴重的出擊失誤,是高空球,好險球落在禁區隊友腳下,但比賽中段開
    始回穩,下半場後段更救了二次單刀,罰球太突然,非他之過...
  2,開場5分鐘內已有2次具威脅性的射門機會,沒進球十分可惜
  3,LK在防守上仍有進步空間,大賽顯得成熟,再多吸些經驗,後防大將之位指日子可待
  4,LK與死鬼默契還不足夠,有些集中力不夠,特別是死鬼,兩次致命失誤,有時更是無壓
    力下犯錯,是集中力不夠的明顯狀況,還有,他盤球的基本功好像沒有很好...
  5,換人上也有疑問,N8下半場機乎失縱,應該換他離場,而不是體力充足的W19,輸第二
    球就是因為N8的失誤造成LK的犯規.
  6,這一場的原地反槍做得很好,但體力消費很大,SONG被換下後,中門大開...
  7,阿沙這場表現還可以,持球後單幹次數較多,D2不論是跟N8,阿沙或恰恰都沒有很
    有效的前插配合,常看到他帶球到對方禁區邊就停下來回傳,不如多試幾次邊路或中
    路ONE TWO.
  8,恰恰的支點做得不夠好,無成功二傳,背身拿球也常失敗,更不說轉身盤帶了,但槍高
    空球仍有少許優勢,有一球明顯的在禁區被絆倒,應是點球,但沒吹.


--

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 180.94.180.171
推 changyg:D2最近上場的幾次,難以苟同他的作用(除了身高強壯).常常夢
→ changyg:遊。或觸球時,又覺得他猶豫而不敢過人....T.T
推 prononhead:受傷太久啦...
推 areyoupigs:我怎麼覺得槍手的後防大將永遠都在指日可待= =
推 ahsoo:樓上, 因為"指"的那一日還沒到
推 areyoupigs:我的意思是槍手來來去去那麼多後衛，幾乎可以說沒一個
→ areyoupigs:有作為的....
推 thisismysoul:我覺得加拉和圖雷 金寶都不錯啊 30一簽留不住老的，
→ thisismysoul:當初又放了圖雷 藥水也是很成功的引援 還是覺得我們
→ thisismysoul:中間少了台絞肉的 宋很優 但d2或d15似乎還是不行..