看板 Arsenal 關於我們 聯絡資訊
http://www.onlinegooner.com/article.php?section=editorial&id=288 The Phil Dowd Show By Kevin Whitcher Online Ed: Is there an unspoken agenda against Arsenal? There were a number of factors in Arsenal’s shocking concession of a 4-0 lead away to Newcastle. Some Arsene Wenger can take responsibility for, some were simply outside of his control. Ultimately, a shocking refereeing performance by Phil Dowd, arguably the worst ever witnessed in the history of the Premier League, enabled Newcastle to equalize, but the Gunners allowed the game to reach the point where his poor officiating made a difference. Who’s the w***er in the black? The first half was perfection. This was the stuff of champions in the making, reminiscent of the great team of 2001-05 at their best. Allowed time and space by Newcastle, they ruthlessly took advantage and sent a message out to Manchester United, kicking off after 5pm. However, the one thing that was totally predictable was that Alan Pardew would tell his players to start making some challenges that would shake up the visitors after the interval. Let them know you are there, rattle them, upset them, see if they can handle it etc etc. Joey Barton was anonymous in the first half, but made his impact in the second. Yet, Arsenal made it easy for him. The visitors were evidently not prepared for this by the coaching staff at half time. So when, all too predictably, a bad challenge from Barton came on Abou Diaby, the Arsenal midfielder rose to the bait and was duly red carded. Hell, if you are going to suffer an early bath at Barton’s expense, the least you should do is break the bastard’s nose. Make it worth it. Diaby meekly pushed him over by the neck and for Barton, it was job done. A man down, it prevented Arsenal controlling the game and allowed Newcastle encouragement to have a go, which they duly did. Wenger cannot be blamed for the injury to Johan Djourou. Where he can be blamed is the fact that, instead of a January transfer window centre back purchase, he had to replace him with the hapless Squillaci. The manager gambled by not addressing this weakness with the £40 million he has in the bank. Today, he started paying the price of losing that bet. How much longer he continues to suffer as a result depends on the length of Djourou’s absence. Suffice it to say, should Squillaci need to start the game against Barcelona on February 16, I shall be placing a seriously large amount of money on an away win. The manager can also be blamed for putting Tomas Rosicky onto the field. This player is history. He contributes nothing and has become pointless. He is past it and will never recapture the form he once possessed. A waste of space. One would like to have thought that a bit of experience might add composure to the side, but it simply did not happen. Regarding Eboue for Walcott, Arsenal would have been better to leave Theo on just to give Newcastle something to think about at the back, given their only chance of attack was on the counter. Now for Phil Dowd. If the first penalty was pretty soft, then I will have to find a new adjective for the second. Szczesny was manhandled to the floor after the first spot kick had been converted in a manner not dissimilar to that of Diaby’s dismissal, and yet it was the keeper who received a caution. Dowd was happy enough waving yellow cards liberally as long as they were to Arsenal players, his inconsistency absolutely stank. By the end of the game, I was remembering all those decisions that seemed to go Manchester United’s way when it comes to the award (or non award against) of penalties, and wondered if there was an agenda against Arsenal amongst the game’s authorities in this country. Could Arsenal ever win the league with handicaps such as Dowd’s display and the leniency shown to United (such as the penalty not given at Blackpool when they were 2-0 down)? Regular contributor Ian Tanner has built up a wealth of evidence about how United are favoured by referees and Dowd seemed to be single-handedly trying to hand them the title in the style of Mike Riley in 2003. However, if Djourou had not been taken off injured (or someone other than Squillaci had entered the fray), I believe that the ball would have been won in the situations that led to the two penalties. If Arsenal had eleven players on the field, they would have found it easier to keep possession and take the sting out of Newcastle’s attempted recovery. The Gunners played enough of a part in their own downfall for Dowd’s incompetence or plain bias to matter. The feeling at the end of the game was ‘There goes the title’. And yet, ultimately it was a case of there goes the opportunity to make up two further points on United’s lead. The result at Molineux meant that Arsenal were a point better off in their attempt to catch United than they were this morning. And critically, the feat of the ‘Invincibles’ will remain a unique one in modern times for a while longer yet. Ultimately, the conclusion of today, in spite of United’s defeat, is that Arsenal are not resilient enough, and do not have the strength in depth to win the title. I sincerely hope I am wrong in that opinion. The current issue of The Gooner will be available from sellers outside the stadium next Saturday at the game against Wolves. For those who cannot make it along to the match, it can be bought online here. 5th February 2011 http://tinyurl.com/6bqja6q 【OnlineGooner】菲爾·多德主演 OnlineGooner 2011年2月1日 作者 凱文·惠徹 新聞來源:http://www.onlinegooner.com/arti ... ditorial&id=288 綜合編譯:hyper2011(阿森納中國網新聞翻譯小組) 版權聲明:轉載請註明出自阿森納中國網 www.arsenal.com.cn 難道是潛規則? 能讓阿森納在4-0領先紐卡斯爾的情況下被逼平的原因當然很多。有些可以讓溫格來負責 ,有些則無可奈何。但凌駕其上的無疑就是菲爾·多德的驚人表演,幫助紐卡斯爾富有爭 議性地創造了英超聯賽歷史上的最強的落後扳平,但對於槍手來說,他們的努力最終只是 悲劇性承託了主裁改變比賽走勢的能力。 [圖]它是這場比賽的w***er(譯註:一般來講,***等於ank) 上半場比賽是完美的。讓我們彷彿看到了2001-05年那支冠軍級別球隊的身影。紐卡斯爾 能做的似乎只是趕緊把比分通知給下午五點開球的曼聯隊。不過主教練帕杜肯定還做了另 一件時,就是在中場休息的時候讓自己的隊員開始用鏟球來騷擾一下客隊。反正大勢已去 ,只能讓它們儘量用傷人的辦法挫挫銳氣了。於是乎,那個上半場默默無聞的喬伊·巴頓 開始大顯身手了。當然,用這種方式踢阿森納,它最來勁。 客隊顯然對於主隊中場的佈置毫無防備。可以預見地,巴頓爆鏟了迪亞比,阿森納中場隨 即中套,拿了紅牌就下去了。話說要是上半場巴頓就這麼搞,忍到下半場迪亞比怎麼說也 得打碎那混蛋的鼻樑骨吧。結果迪亞比只是「推了」一下它的「圍脖」就完事了。 計謀得逞,人數佔優,阿森納對比賽失控,這令紐卡斯爾則越發大膽,而且的確沒有一點 客氣的意思。「小新」受傷不能怪教授吧,頂多只能說他沒在冬季市場買球員又一次使得 霉運召之即來,他又一次打出了手上唯一一張牌,斯奎拉奇。現在看來,教授把傳說中的 4000萬存在銀行裡比花出去更像是賭博吧。新的一盤賭局又開始了,賭局的長短視「小新 」的傷勢而定。再具體點說,2月16日又要殘兵對陣巴薩,按常理我們又應該押寶客隊贏 ,是吧。 另一個備受爭議的地方就是派上羅西基。屬於他的美好瞬間已成往事。他上場後乏善可陳 ,登場顯得毫無意義。他的經驗並沒有提升球隊。而用埃布埃替換沃爾科特也值得商榷, 小老虎留在場上或許可以讓對手惦記著後場,迫使其只能選擇防守反擊。 重點是那個菲爾·多德。如果第一個點球算是吹得比較「軟」的話,那第二個點球我就找 不到形容詞來形容了。「小波」在失球後被摁倒在地,怎麼說程度上和之前迪亞比的紅牌 無二致,可是卻被警告。只要是面對阿森納球員,它就總是很樂意把黃牌掏出來揮舞,尺 度不一、令人作嘔。這讓我感覺對手好像是曼聯了,對手很容易獲得點球,相反我們幾乎 沒機會獲得點球。這就是傳說中對付阿森納的潛規則嗎?阿森納贏得聯賽的代價就是缺胳 膊少腿嗎?阿森納就不能獲得向對曼聯那樣仁慈的吹罰嗎?本站的Ian Tanner曾統計過曼 聯被裁判照顧的種種證據,現在看來新的證據還在不斷湧現,而多德正在像2003年得麥克 ·萊利那樣一手將獎盃獻給曼聯。 儘管,如果不是小新受傷、斯奎拉奇準備不足,我相信比賽即便有那兩個點球還是可以拿 下來的。而如果槍手保持11人在場上,控球會更加輕鬆,也許紐卡斯爾根本就沒有反撲的 機會。槍手們的不佳表現還是為多德的表演提供了舞台。 比賽結束時的第一感覺就是「冠軍又遠去了」。我已經準備好心情去看積分榜的差距又添 兩分。可是莫利紐球場那邊的結果使得阿森納反而追上了一分,而唯一「不敗賽季」的神 話又一次得到了保護。於是重新整理心情總結今天的比賽,阿森納的韌性還不足,陣容厚 度依然不足以配得上冠軍。當然,我也真誠地希望我的想法是錯誤的。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.224.44.206
prononhead:Hell, if you are going to suffer an early bath at B 02/07 13:53
prononhead:Barton’s expense, the least you should do is break 02/07 13:54
prononhead:the bastard’s nose. 02/07 13:54
Nvboy:非常中肯、無論對內對外 02/07 15:23
sejour:Dowd也吃了Newcastle的球(or邊裁?) 還是把他請出英超吧orz 02/07 18:45
sejour:至於受到不利裁罰這件事, 我都相信出來混總會還的XD 02/07 18:56
Nvboy:你誤會了,質疑Dowd的重點並不是他吃了誰的球,我也希望紐卡 02/07 19:12
Nvboy:的球算進阿,只是他的問題在於比賽的給牌尺度很差勁阿。阿比 02/07 19:12
Nvboy:動手打人很差勁該死,紅牌應該,那他有沒有想過為什麼被剷的 02/07 19:13
Nvboy:人為什麼反應會這麼激烈?結果對方連一張黃都沒有。上半場終 02/07 19:14
Nvboy:了前,Barton同樣雙腳把沙皇給剷飛在天,結果?也是甚麼都沒 02/07 19:14
Nvboy:有。之所以這麼憤怒就是因為裁判老是忽略被剷的權益,正如過 02/07 19:15
Nvboy:去eduardo跟ramsey事件一樣,只有真的斷腿才懂得掏牌,那我 02/07 19:15
Nvboy:請他來幹馬?有興趣的自己去找D2那個重播,運氣差點他一定是 02/07 19:16
Nvboy:二度斷腿。如果對方真的覺得這種剷球沒甚麼不應該告誡,那何 02/07 19:18
Nvboy:必當初HBA被人斷腿會這麼憤慨,這根本就一樣的事,你不能說 02/07 19:21
Nvboy:腿沒斷就血性阿,血淋老木啦 02/07 19:21
Lansbury:推部長 有些人還刻意扯到其他問題去 02/07 19:34
briankch:別介意那堆腦殘 02/07 20:16
flameflash:我始終認為巴鈍的那一鏟之惡毒不亞於馬汀泰勒對花朵那 02/07 20:43
flameflash:斷腿惡鏟。還是一句話,為保護英超球員,收容巴鈍的球 02/07 20:44
flameflash:隊快快降級去吧,不送。只有5分的距離,還有13場。走著 02/07 20:46
flameflash:瞧吧。 02/07 20:46
sejour:沒有否定裁罰標準很爛......只是從那球感到他不一定是意圖 02/07 20:48
sejour:偏袒誰而是他本身就是個很爛的裁判 02/07 20:48
overall:喬巴頓本來就是個垃圾 02/07 21:22
j91526frank:球會有沒有向足總申訴主裁判決的管道?類似申訴紅牌這 02/07 21:45
j91526frank:樣?即使已經不影響勝負至少也給主裁一些壓力 02/07 21:48
dreamender:FA好像有時候會針對場上球員的危險動作做出調查 02/07 21:59
dreamender:像之前巴頓偷偷給薄命漢的球員暗拳就被判停賽 02/07 22:00
dreamender:可是似乎沒啥聽過對裁判有判罰的 除非是收黑錢 02/07 22:00
Lansbury:裁判會停執法的樣子 或是轉而吹低級別? 02/07 22:34
prononhead:好像有聽過誰被停的.. 02/07 22:40
iceteeth:這周很像有很多誤判 感覺英超裁判素質... 02/08 23:42