2013投票討論

[ajburnett (The go-to guy)]

從Astros County看到的整理。
http://tinyurl.com/7egg9u8
16名MLB.COM的作家給了一些關於2013名人堂投票的意見。
http://tinyurl.com/8xmrrpn

以下是關於老帥哥和老巴的意見：

Mike Bauman: Yes on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell

Barry Bloom: Yes on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell

Hal Bodley: No on Biggio (I do not feel Piazza, Schilling and Biggio are
legitimate first-ballot candidates.). Maybe on Bagwell

Peter Gammons: Yes on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell

Ken Gurnick: No on anybody who played in the Steroid Era

Chris Haft: Tentative Yes on Biggio, Tentative Yes on Bagwell

Paul Hagen: No on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell

Richard Justice: Yes on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell  (顏色正確)

Dick Kaegel: Too complicated

Terence Moore: Undecided

Carrie Muskat: This year, I plan on doing more homework regarding the new
candidates on the Hall of Fame ballot. I want to talk to others in the game
and will then make a decision.

Mark Newman: Yes on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell

Marty Noble: Biggio is an "unstained candidate." Undecided on Bagwell

Tom Singer: Yes on Biggio, Yes on Bagwell

Lyle Spencer: Craig Biggio will be given serious consideration, but I'm not
sure he's a first-ballot guy. Undecided on Bagwell

T.R. Sullivan: Biggio should be a first-ballot lock. It would be great if
Bagwell joins him.




--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 114.36.100.23
推 dimhdp10:希望兩位都能順利入選...是說Bagwell真有這麼被看好嗎？
→ dimhdp10:還是我比較悲觀窮擔心了QQ
推 googoodoll:今年對手不強的狀況都沒進了,明年我不認為會比較高
推 FreeFly:其實對手強不強不是重點  每個人手中有10票
→ FreeFly:問題只在於他們願不願意投yes  明年不會有10個比老巴還強
→ FreeFly:不過當然肯定有幾個老頑固會堅持他覺不頭超過3張yes
推 googoodoll:照Free兄這麼說其實不可能把10票投給同一個人囉?
→ googoodoll:如果這樣那我覺得只要***被否定老巴應該明年就要進
→ FreeFly:當然不可以給一個人10票啊  XD   是可以給最多10個人
→ FreeFly:那些人都有自己的堅持和脾氣  像上面名單就有一個死都不投
→ FreeFly:yes給類固醇年代的球員  有的是累積數據派[Biggio有利]
→ FreeFly:有些是巔峰表現派[老巴有利]  有些是你他媽的我就是要卡你
→ FreeFly:幾年再投yes  XD
推 googoodoll:我以為是每人手上有10票,然後隨意給candidate這樣
→ googoodoll:唉總之他們兩個都趕快進去就對了,這球隊已經快被玩爛了
→ googoodoll:明年之後還要到莫名其妙到AL去持續被痛宰