作者d9004003 (ming)
看板Aviation
標題[新聞] 貨機墜機 in Bagram
時間Wed May 1 10:07:39 2013
原網址
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/04/30
/weather-may-have-played-role-in-horrifying-bagram-airfield-crash/
縮網址
http://ppt.cc/uhNf
影片連結
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vo51Be2jL8c
The Washington Post
Weather may have played role in horrifying Bagram Airfield Crash
A 747 U.S. cargo plane crashed on its ascent from Bagram, Afghanistan Monday,
killing all 7 American crew members aboard. The exact cause of the crash is
not known, but thunderstorms were in the area.
The plane, in route to Dubai (United Arab Emirates), was carrying 5 military
vehicles according to the Aviation Herald.
The Aviation Herald describes the sequence of events leading up to the crash:
Several observers on the ground reported the National Air Cargo Boeing
747-400 had just lifted off and was climbing through approximately 1200 feet
when it’s nose sharply rose, the aircraft appeared to have stalled and came
down erupting in a blaze.
METARS – weather reports intended primarily for aviation purposes – show
thunderstorms and swirling winds coincided with the takeoff. From
Aviation-Safety.net:
A thunderstorm with Cumulonimbus clouds was approaching the air base at the
time of the accident. A weather report shows winds began shifting from 100
degrees [from the east] at 09:55 UTC to 350 degrees [from the north] at 10:55
UTC. Accident time was about 15:00 LT / 10:30 UTC
“One army spokesperson said the crash occurred due to low altitude after
takeoff,” reports Business Insider, which quoted a pilot who said a cargo
shift may have contributed. Whether it was the weather, loose cargo, and/or
other factors that prevented the plane from gaining altitude will presumably
be determined in crash assessments.
Below is a terrifying video of the crash obtained from a car’s dashboard
camera. C
Caution: it is very disturbing footage which may upset some viewers. Also, it
contains an expletive around 1 minute and 13 seconds into the video.
從影片看來像是被強風影響到攻角,還請高手解惑。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 120.126.12.55
→ Piin:載運物沒固定好.. 05/01 10:12
推 loomissayles:新聞說是機艙內的軍用車沒固定好... 05/01 10:13
推 virtualcell:新聞說貨物移位只是可能性之一 但主要是高度過低 05/01 10:30
推 she520328:G/W CG跑掉 GG 05/01 10:44
推 waynechemi:所以一開始有人說是把747F當C130飛是原因之一嗎? 05/01 11:18
推 Timk:影片上輪胎是放下來的耶...why? 05/01 12:23
→ Jimmy2010:還沒來的及收就STALL了吧 05/01 12:26
推 a882061:組員們…………RIP 05/01 12:33
推 Miketroutla:這影片有點恐怖........ 05/01 12:38
→ dreamkid:R.I.P. 05/01 12:57
→ yesOh:沒有組員會故意把飛機當另一種飛機飛的... 05/01 13:13
→ yesOh:說飛行員把747當C130飛實在很沒口德 05/01 13:15
推 tfe60:影片747好像變成氣球 亂飄.. 05/01 13:25
→ willychn33:那只是比喻 沒有嚴重到沒口德吧 05/01 14:26
→ kc135:那家航空公司本來就很多是美空軍或是空中國民兵轉職的.... 05/01 16:03
→ kc135:他還是空運司令部的租機 05/01 16:04
推 momber:RIP.. 05/01 17:42
→ lgp:看影片好像氣動力重心跟重心不對 05/01 20:22
→ Ecclestone:C130 應該失速角度比747小?? 05/01 21:30
推 spone:為啥行車紀錄器上的日期是2013/02/01?? 05/01 21:46
推 kimi255085:沒調而已吧 05/01 21:54
→ court0043:CG 超過aft limit, 八九不離十又超載. 05/01 22:11
推 eevo8tw:RIP,突然在空中停住然後跟氣球一樣的飄著,真可怕 05/05 20:30