看板 Aviation 關於我們 聯絡資訊
原網址 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/04/30 /weather-may-have-played-role-in-horrifying-bagram-airfield-crash/ 縮網址 http://ppt.cc/uhNf 影片連結 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vo51Be2jL8c
The Washington Post Weather may have played role in horrifying Bagram Airfield Crash A 747 U.S. cargo plane crashed on its ascent from Bagram, Afghanistan Monday, killing all 7 American crew members aboard. The exact cause of the crash is not known, but thunderstorms were in the area. The plane, in route to Dubai (United Arab Emirates), was carrying 5 military vehicles according to the Aviation Herald. The Aviation Herald describes the sequence of events leading up to the crash: Several observers on the ground reported the National Air Cargo Boeing 747-400 had just lifted off and was climbing through approximately 1200 feet when it’s nose sharply rose, the aircraft appeared to have stalled and came down erupting in a blaze. METARS – weather reports intended primarily for aviation purposes – show thunderstorms and swirling winds coincided with the takeoff. From Aviation-Safety.net: A thunderstorm with Cumulonimbus clouds was approaching the air base at the time of the accident. A weather report shows winds began shifting from 100 degrees [from the east] at 09:55 UTC to 350 degrees [from the north] at 10:55 UTC. Accident time was about 15:00 LT / 10:30 UTC “One army spokesperson said the crash occurred due to low altitude after takeoff,” reports Business Insider, which quoted a pilot who said a cargo shift may have contributed. Whether it was the weather, loose cargo, and/or other factors that prevented the plane from gaining altitude will presumably be determined in crash assessments. Below is a terrifying video of the crash obtained from a car’s dashboard camera. C Caution: it is very disturbing footage which may upset some viewers. Also, it contains an expletive around 1 minute and 13 seconds into the video. 從影片看來像是被強風影響到攻角,還請高手解惑。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 120.126.12.55
Piin:載運物沒固定好.. 05/01 10:12
loomissayles:新聞說是機艙內的軍用車沒固定好... 05/01 10:13
virtualcell:新聞說貨物移位只是可能性之一 但主要是高度過低 05/01 10:30
she520328:G/W CG跑掉 GG 05/01 10:44
waynechemi:所以一開始有人說是把747F當C130飛是原因之一嗎? 05/01 11:18
Timk:影片上輪胎是放下來的耶...why? 05/01 12:23
Jimmy2010:還沒來的及收就STALL了吧 05/01 12:26
a882061:組員們…………RIP 05/01 12:33
Miketroutla:這影片有點恐怖........ 05/01 12:38
dreamkid:R.I.P. 05/01 12:57
yesOh:沒有組員會故意把飛機當另一種飛機飛的... 05/01 13:13
yesOh:說飛行員把747當C130飛實在很沒口德 05/01 13:15
tfe60:影片747好像變成氣球 亂飄.. 05/01 13:25
willychn33:那只是比喻 沒有嚴重到沒口德吧 05/01 14:26
kc135:那家航空公司本來就很多是美空軍或是空中國民兵轉職的.... 05/01 16:03
kc135:他還是空運司令部的租機 05/01 16:04
momber:RIP.. 05/01 17:42
lgp:看影片好像氣動力重心跟重心不對 05/01 20:22
Ecclestone:C130 應該失速角度比747小?? 05/01 21:30
spone:為啥行車紀錄器上的日期是2013/02/01?? 05/01 21:46
kimi255085:沒調而已吧 05/01 21:54
court0043:CG 超過aft limit, 八九不離十又超載. 05/01 22:11
eevo8tw:RIP,突然在空中停住然後跟氣球一樣的飄著,真可怕 05/05 20:30