Re: [外電] Nate McMillan, miracle worker

[JerrydBatum (Nicholas Bayless)]

: bmapile
: ------------------------------
: Nate for Coach of the Year. I don't understand why Scott Brooks is getting
: all the consideration. Sure he's took a team from 23 wins to maybe 50 wins
: this season, but at the 8th spot. Last year Nate took a team who every
: analyst said wont make the playoffs or will get 8th seed, made them tied for
: second in the win column in the western conference and co-division champions
: going to the playoffs with the 4th seed. No Coach of the Year for Brooks.
: But I may just be bitter than Nate McMillan is likely going to get snubbed
: again this year for COTY.
: --------------------------------------------------
  美國鄉民一：

  我支持Nate得最佳教練。 我不明白為什麼Scott Brooks得到所有的關注。他的確將
  球隊從23勝帶到了50勝，但是在第八種子。 去年Nate帶著不被看好進季後賽，或者
  最多第八種子的阿拓，拿下西區第二的勝場，並列分組冠軍及拿下第四種子。
  這樣看來Brooks根本不該拿到最佳教練。 但我覺得Nate會再次心酸地被排除在這個
  獎項之外。

: blue9   ( 這篇很不錯 )
: --------------------
: Sure, he might keep them focused - and that's important - but his "playbook"
: still sucks. I'm sorry, that bit about Dante being "out of step with the
: playbook" made me chuckle. What playbook? And assuming there is a playbook,
: was Outlaw ever IN step with it?
: What we've been seeing is Miller going about his business ever since his
: "high volume chat" with Nate. Miller and Camby are more responsible for our
: success than Nate - perhaps they should share the COY award between the two
: of them.
: ----------------------------------
  美國鄉民二：
　
　Nate或許讓球員們更加專注，而那是重要的沒錯。　但他的戰術依舊爛透了。很抱歉
　，但我真的對”小康與戰術格格不入那段”暗自發笑。　什麼戰術？　假使我們真的
　有戰術好了，法外有和它相融過嗎？
　我們所看到的是Miller在與Nate"大聲溝通後”，Miller漸漸打出他的身手。Miller
　和Camby更是我們達到目前成績的關鍵，或許他們應該和Nate一起分享最佳教練。

: ---------------------
: Sure, Nate has much more knowledge of the game than I do - but that doesn't
: mean he's doing a good job. Let's take a look at just some of the things that
: Nate has done a poor job on: 1) We're playing the same brand of basketball
: that we played when we had Zach/etc. 2) He didn't come into this season with
: any sort of plan on how to integrate key new players - he wanted Miller to
: play like Blake and Oden to play like Joel. 3) He said the best PG in
: training camp would earn the starting spot, and then gave it to Blake when
: Miller clearly outplayed him. 4) He played a 3-guard line-up, which put our
: two players out of position - one of them being our STAR SG! 5) He's preaches
: defense, but we still haven't seen good team defense - all our defense comes
: from the talents of Batum/Webster and Joel/Oden/Camby. 6) Along with defense
: he preaches "team" basketball, but continually played Outlaw when he played
: zero defense and was continually lost in the most basic NBA offensive sets.
: 7) Isolations and jump shots - enough said about that.

　當然Nate對於比賽的知識了解遠比我還多，但這並不代表他做得很棒。讓我們來談談
　他哪些地方做得很糟吧。
　（１）我們一直打著一樣風格的籃球，就算是當ZBO還在隊上的時候。
　（２）他並沒有為可能是我們進步關鍵的新球員到來作任何準備，他要Miller打得像
　　　　Blake，Oden打得像大P。
　（３）他說他會讓訓練營打最好的人當先發PG，而他還是給了Blake，即使Miller表現
　　　　得比較好。
　（４）他打了三後衛的陣容，讓原本兩個球員得去打不適合的位置，其中一個還是我們
　　　　的明星後衛！
　（５）他一直強調防守，但我們一直也沒看到好的團隊防守。我們的防守都是幾乎是靠
　　　　著Batum/Web以及大P/Oden/Camby在撐。
　（６）他強調團隊籃球，但他一直讓Outlaw在場上就算他根本不會防守，且即使是基本
　　　　的NBA進攻也是同樣。
　（７）單打和跳投　-　這部份已經不需要我再說了


: So yes, Nate is good at keeping the team focused and that's gone a long way
: towards our success. But aside from that - which ANY coach should do - he's
: not very good. What we're seeing is Miller, and now Camby, running the team
: and teaching the young guys the small nuances that will make them and the
: team better. It's similar to Nash in PHX - everyone thought that (d)'Antoni
: was a great coach but it was Nash who was running the show. Nash is still
: doing his thing and (d)'Antoni isn't looking like much of a coach in NY -
: nobody expected him to win, but they expected SOMETHING.
: -----------------------------------------------------------------

　的確Nate讓球員專注地邁向我們現在的成功。　但除此之外--任何教練該做的--他並
  沒有做得很好。 我們現在看到的是 Miller和Camby帶領著team，教導著我們的年輕球
  員一些讓team變更好的一些小細節。 這有點類似Nash之於太陽 - 所有人都覺得
  D'Antonie是個很棒的教練，但實際上是Nash在帶領著。 Nash現在依舊很棒 ，而
  在紐約的D'Antonie看起來就不是那麼好了 -- 沒有人期待獲勝，但期待著something
  (應該是指今年夏天)


  < 其實我在想這篇會不會是板友打的  XD >　



: eskimo
: --------------
: The people who think that Nate is a bad coach don't know much about
: basketball.
: ---------------------------------------------------
  鄉民三：

  那些認為Nate是個不好的教練的人們一定不太懂籃球。

: heckamajecka
: ------------------
: finally a voice of sanity in the insanity that is Oregonlive commentary.
: Watch all the haters come out.
: -------------------------
  鄉民四:

  Oregonlive的報導真是亂世中的一股清流。
  看來酸民們又要出動了。

: darkvanilla
: --------------
: One thing I've been noticing is Nate is a way better coach when Roy isn't on
: the floor. I think the problem is he leans on Roy too much for offense and
: only runs horrible sets for him. When Roy's gone, Nate actually runs an
: offense, which gets good shots (great example was the the flex cut that got
: Batum an easy jam to put the Thunder away).
: ----------------------------
  鄉民五：
　　
　我有注意到一件事是，當Roy不在時Nate帶得好多了。　我覺得問題是他在進攻時太倚
　重Roy，也只弄些亂七八糟的進攻設定給他。　當Roy不在時，Nate反倒真的可以讓我們
　的進攻有好的出手。　有個好例子就是對雷霆時運用flex cut讓Batum輕鬆拿分

　＜flex是指利用掩護後再為另外一名隊友做掩護＞

: BigaBong
: ---------------------
: Nate is good coach when he has only 7 players to play with and No Roy
: around,..It took him 4 years to get from 20 wins to 50 wins..
: Scott Brooks got it on second year he got with team!!!That's impressive!!
: And whoever says that other cities columnists know anything ...they coming
: from what you are coming :" ohh he won 50 games with 300 games of injuries""
: Read my first sentence!!!
: We have great and deep roster(thanks KP) and even if we lost all starters due
: to injuries we still would win 50 games even without Nate!!
: ----------------------------------

  鄉民六：

　當只有七名球員而且不包涵Roy時，Nate是個好教練...。
  他花了四年從20勝到50勝，而Scott Brooks在第二年就達到了，而且是靠團隊的進步!!
  讓人驚豔!!
  而不管誰說其他城市的專欄寫了什麼，他們也只是一樣從同樣的管道得到的消息 (這句
  我不太確定怎麼翻) :''哦!他贏了50勝即使300場都有球員受傷" (這裡不知道是他打錯
  還是我不了解)
  看看我的第一句話!!!
  我們有著很棒深度也很夠的球員陣容(謝謝KP)，而就算沒有Nate的帶領，且我們所有的
  先發都受傷了，我們依然可以贏到50勝!!

: Watch Nate closely in playoffs..You will see how great he is..He will panic
: ..he will shuffle roster ..he will be robotic on his decisions.. He will play
: Bayless and Howard for extended period of time and we will fall back even
: deeper..
: Just watch!!
: And yes ..we will get Utah in first round..
: -----------------------------

  仔細觀察Nate在季後賽的樣子吧...你會看到他有多棒...你會看到他隨機的球員輪替..
  ...你會看到他不知變通的制式決定...他會讓Bayless和Howard上很長的時間而我們會
  徹底地失敗。



--
◥███◤      ◥██◣ Ｂｌａｚｅｒｓ◢█  ＲＩＳＥ★ＷＩＴＨ★ＵＳ ◢█
    █          ▋    █                 █                         ◢◤◤
     ◤          ▋  ◢◤ ◢█◤ █  ◤   █ ◢█◣ ◢█◣ ◢█◣  ◢◤  ◢
    ◢    ▍▌  ▋  ◥◣ █  ◢ █  ◢   ◤ █  ◤ ◥▂   ◥▂    ◥▅▅█▅◣
◢  █          ▋    █ █  █ ◥█◤   ◢ █◤◢   ￣◣   ￣◣        █
◥█◤          ◥◤◢◤ ◥◤█   █     █ ◥█◤ ◥█◤ ◥█◤        ◤

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.131.30.40
推 MinShooter:推翻譯
推 dakkk:沒有七號戰術的季後賽 希望能對他改觀
推 aoba:小心打A米戰術!!
→ ksk0516:A米爆氣50分再現
推 Fernandez05:推翻譯!
推 aoba:再推一次!!
推 voon:沒有七號戰術還有12號跟24號戰術阿
推 dash0804:推翻譯~
※ 編輯: JerrydBatum     來自: 61.217.160.69        (04/16 16:03)
推 fatponda:推
推 roy7175:看得很爽!
推 tPA:推翻譯...米國還是有人看到真相的，不曉得PO到blazersedge那邊
→ tPA:教練或高層會不會看得到:P
→ muxiv: 沒有七號戰術的季後賽  https://muxiv.com