Mitchell J. Nathanson, "The Irrelevance of Major League Baseball's
Antitrust Exemption: A Historical Review," Rutgers Law Review 58:1,
1-43(2005), available at: http://works.bepress.com/mitchell_nathanson/3 .
==
[Abstract]
Intro.
I. The Origin and Scope of Baseball's Antitrust Exemption
II. The Irrelevance of Baseball's Antitrust Exemption in the
Continuaition and Ultimate Abolishment of the Reserve Clause
A. The Historical Development of the Reserve Clause
B. The Lords' Policy of Misinformation
C. The Creation of The MLBPA and the Dismantling of the Reserve Clause
By Way of Contract Law
III. The Irrelevance of the Exemption with Regard to Franchise
Relocation and Expansion
A. Franchise Relocation Pursuant to the Sherman Act:
The NFL and Raiders I
B. MLB Franchise Relocation and Expansion under the Exemption:
A Difference Without a Distinction
1. The First Wave of Relocation:
The Braves, Browns and Athletics - 1953-55
a. Congressional Intervention through the House Monopoly
Subcommittee and the Lingering effects of the PCL's
Attempted Merger
b. Appeasement of Congress through the Relocation of the Braves
and Browns
c. The Relocation of the Athletics
2. Congressional Intervention and the First Wave of MLB
Expansion – 1961-62
3. The Proposed Relocation of the Giants and Expansion into
Tampa Bay – 1992-95
Conclusion
--
「你說左冷禪下手將咱二人害了？
哼，咱們既已在武林立足，那又顧得了這許多？
前怕虎，後怕狼的，還能在江湖上混麼？」
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.70.164.90