看板 CD-R 關於我們 聯絡資訊
BLOG版 http://lightwing.pixnet.net/blog/post/34943281 上次的測試,因為LG燒得很爛, 所以這次部分測試改用S05去燒.... 使用同樣的凝膠紫外線成像系統,同樣照射讀取面 片子來源有些是要淘汰的,所以原始寫入品質會有差異... 首先是上次測無法讀取的Verbatim BD-R 2X LTH Type,皆使用Pioneer BDR-S05XLB燒錄 無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L01.jpg
UV照射5min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L02.jpg
無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L03.jpg
UV照射10min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L04.jpg
無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L05.jpg
UV照射15min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L06.jpg
後面那個紅線,經查是有撞擊痕跡之類的... http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L07.jpg
無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L08.jpg
UV照射20min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L09.jpg
最後來個整理表格 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L21.jpg
接下來是Imation BD-R 4X,RiTEK代工,HTL Type,Pioneer BDR-S05XLB燒錄 UV照射完後,5min照射和10min照射,LiteOn iHES208會辨識成0G的BDROM http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L10.jpg
15min和20min的則是辨識不能,所以改用糾錯力較強的ASUS BW-12B1LT@LiteOn iHBS212韌體做測試 無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L11.jpg
UV照射5min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L12.jpg
看起來只是LDS和BIS和無UV照射的來比有升高.... 無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L13.jpg
UV照射10min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L14.jpg
中間部分.....= = 無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L15.jpg
UV照射15min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L16.jpg
外圈.... 無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L17.jpg
UV照射20min http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L18.jpg
最外圈可以說是很糟糕 最後來個Verbatim BD-R 4X LTH Type,LG BH10LS30燒錄 (和上面的不一樣,這是不同片做對照) 無UV照射 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L19.jpg
UV照射10min對照 http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o206/lightwing-1/BLOG/UV2/L20.jpg
結論: 1.理論上應該是相變化金屬的HTL Type比較耐UV, 但是這次測試可以看到HTL Type還是有差異的..... 2.燒錄機差異也會造成保存性差異 Pioneer BDR-S05燒Verbatim BD-R 2X + UV照射20min後仍可以正常讀取。 上次用LG燒的就.....= = 3.增加UV照射時間,品質會越來越差(廢話) 但LDC、BIS增加的幅度卻不是線性的,不過樣本數很少,沒有代表性就是...... -- Plextor 1210TS CD-R專門 ───┐ Optiarc AD-7200S & BenQ DW1640 DVD燒錄─── Pioneer BDR-S05XLB BD-R專屬 ───應該不欠啥了!? BenQ DW1620 & ASUS BW-12B1LT 品質測試 BenQ DW1670 最後防線 ─── 謎之聲:BDXL呢? ( ̄□ ̄|||)a -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.117.47.8
kaorucyc:推 05/29 03:00
Waffen:專業 05/29 03:08
gq8919983:推。 05/29 11:50
yoshitsugu:推 05/29 13:26
gtm310050:LG哭哭~~只能燒LTH4X和HTL TYPE了 05/29 14:40