Re: [外電] Yep, Wang is definitely NOT an ace

[YGJHSU (杰)]

這篇還蠻有趣的 簡單翻一下

※ 引述《wesun (統一獅王重返榮耀^^)》之銘言：
: 其實這位作者還有一篇
: 不過感覺他很喜歡我們的
: 小王就是了^^
: 大家可以幫我縮嗎 = ="
: http://www.bugsandcranks.com/new-york-yankees/yep-wang-is-definitely-not-an-ace/
: Yeah, that Chien-Ming Wang is DEFINITELY not an ace. Nope. Definitely not a
: No. 1 guy who can match up with the game’s best starters and come out on top
: more often than not.
  對，王建民保證不是一個ACE,絕對不是那個可以跟CY等級強投捉對廝殺，並且多半能夠
  取得勝利的強力投手
: Nope. No way. Hell, even catcher Jorge Posada said during the off-season that
: the Yankees should have made the Johan Santana trade because
: “we need a No. 1.”
  不，絕對不是。就連隊上的捕手Posada都在季後表示，希望能交易到Santana,
  因為洋基需要一個ACE
: Nope. Despite a major-league leading 38 wins in 2006 and 2007 and only 13
: losses, he can’t get any respect. Not even from his own teammates.
  即使連續兩年拿下19勝，總共只吞下13敗，王建民依然無法獲得大家尊敬，
  甚至是他的隊友。
 (編按：我覺得這邊有點偏頗，Posada表示希望獲得Santana也不代表他甚至隊上其他人不
  尊重王，這點可以從其他外電看出)
: I beg to differ. He isn’t a flashy strikeout pitcher or a talkative,
: attention-grabbing personality. He is just a groundball machine who gets deep
: in games and consistently and wins more often than just about every other
: starter in the game.
  我請大家換個角度思考。他不是一個狂丟三振的投手，賽後也很少大放厥詞引人矚目。
  但，他就像一台滾地球機器，每場穩定地投到比賽的後段，最後贏得比聯盟大部分投手
  更多的勝利。
: An ace? I think so. Go ahead and name 10 starters in the major leagues who are
: CLEARLY better than Wang right now. And if you really want to go to the
: trouble, back up your argument with the numbers to prove it.
  這樣的表現叫做王牌嗎？就我來看是的。不然請你提出大聯盟裡明顯比他更好的10個先
  發投手啊，如果你發現有點難找，那麼你就必須提出其他證據證明"王不是一個王牌"
: I doubt you’ll be able to do that, conclusively. So, how do you make the
: argument that a guy who is undoubtedly one of the game’s 10 best starters is
: NOT an ace? I don’t think you can.
  我猜你很難找到證據。所以，為什麼你會認為一個幾乎毫無疑問聯盟前10名的先發投手
  不是王牌呢？我真的很難以理解。

: Wang (2-0) won again Sunday, throwing 6.1 shutout innings in a 2-0 victory
: over Tampa Bay. By the way, his opponent Sunday was James Shields — the best
: starter the Rays have.
  王在禮拜一對光芒投出精彩好球，6.1局沒有掉分，他的對手也不是省油的燈，是目前
  坦帕灣最好的先發投手Shields
  (編按：Scott Kozmir目前受傷)
: Oh, and his other victory this season? A 3-2 win over Toronto ace Roy
: Halladay, one of the game’s best pitchers, in which he pitched 7 excellent
: innings.
  那他本季第一場勝利呢？是從前CY獎得主Halladay手中所拿下，那場他投了7局好球
: He can’t win big playoff games, the Wang bashers say. And yes, Wang was
: awful in the playoffs last season posting a 19.06 ERA in two brutal starts.
: Yes, he is 0-3 with a 7.58 ERA in three playoff starts.
  也有不看好王建民的人說，他不會在季後賽贏球。對! 他上一個球季的爛我們有目共睹
  面對印地安人兩場都爆炸了 防禦率19.06 生涯季後賽防禦率也高達7.58
: Wang was awful in last season’s playoffs. But, look a little closer at his
: 2005 and 2006 performances. As a rookie in 2005, he pitched 6.2 innngs in a
: loss to Anaheim, allowing just one run. In 2006, against Detroit, he again
: pitched 6.2 innings, this time allowing three runs. So, one of those outings
: was dominant, the other pretty good.
  上個球季很糟糕，不代表05跟06年的表現很差。事實上，05年王以新人姿態在季後賽
  投出一場好球，可惜最後敗給天使。06年，對老虎也投的不差。
: He was bad last season, but don’t tell me he can’t pitch in the playoffs.
: He has shown that he can.
  所以不要根據上一季的表現告訴我王建民不能投季後賽。他已經證明他可以。
: So, go right ahead and keep thinking Wang isn’t an ace. Some Yankee fans —
: and even players like Posada — might agree. I don’t care, and I don’t
: think Wang does either.
  所以...繼續認為王建民不是王牌吧，就像有些球迷跟球員想的那樣，我不在乎，
  我也不認為王建民會放在心上。
: He is just going to keep pounding hitters with that sinker and, most
: importantly, winning games. Isn’t that what an ace does?
  他只要繼續用沈重伸卡球蹂躪打者，然後，最重要的是，拿下比賽勝利。
  這不就是一個王牌該做的事嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.243.242
推 millertw:推啦
※ 編輯: YGJHSU          來自: 140.112.243.242      (04/08 14:58)
※ 編輯: YGJHSU          來自: 140.112.243.242      (04/08 15:00)
推 wjc:推!!感謝翻譯,辛苦了~~~~
推 soaringfish:推  感謝翻譯 :)
推 Eric0605:辛苦了
推 sean302:好兇阿@@
推 dspswen:v(￣︶￣)y推
推 face4rent:這篇翻得不錯
推 Cobalamin:好個蹂躪~~~XDD
推 herztier:有看有推!
推 cherubictw:謝謝翻譯  看了好開心阿
推 scjh123:在洋基季後賽=everything...連RJ、AROD這種等級的選手都會
→ scjh123:因為季後賽鳥掉而被打成像畜生一樣.王這樣其實不算什麼..
推 Tony0422:這篇真的寫得很好耶~~看了很爽 感謝翻譯哩
推 polishing:哈! 沒發現跟你同時翻耶 ...
推 praymid:譯得不錯，感謝～