應該會推女主角

[paulik (The Rotten Age)]

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/files/2008/10/big-questions-b.html

In which category will Cate Blanchett ("The Curious Case of Benjamin
Button"), Philip Seymour Hoffman ("Doubt"), and Michael Sheen ("Frost/Nixon")
end up?

These things can always change, but at the moment we're hearing that Hoffman
will go supporting and Blanchett and Sheen will go lead. These are all
carefully calculated moves.

...

Blanchett has already received five nominations and won one of them. She is
the second coming of Meryl Streep: an immensely talented actress who has
acquired such reverence among her peers that she could simply slop on a
little makeup and yell for two hours and get nominated. (How else do you
account for her lead nomination last year for the entirely mediocre
"Elizabeth: The Golden Age"?) So if "Benjamin Button" is even half as good as
some of us believe it could be, then are Academy members really going to vote
for a performance by a relative ingenue like Anne Hathaway in "Rachel Getting
Married" over a tried-and-true vet like Blanchett? A huge chunk of voters
don't even watch the movies, so are they going to reward a worthy but
under-the-radar performance like Melissa Leo's in "Frozen River" or a
familiar name like Blanchett? I'm not saying that Blanchett won't be worthy
of a nod or that those other women won't get one anyway... just that
Blanchett has to do less to get one than other contenders.

--

【倒片女王】凱特布蘭琪【票房毒藥】
～ＣＡＴＥ ＢＬＡＮＣＨＥＴＴ～
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button‧班傑明的奇幻情緣

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 86.25.206.248
→ paulik:筆者的論點在於凱特的演技盛名讓她「比較容易」獲得選票
→ paulik:我贊成他一半的論點，但我還是希望凱特交出讓人心服的成績
→ paulik:去年黃金年代入圍被一堆人罵，我替她覺得不公平。電影爛
→ paulik:代表演出的水準。黃金年代演出我覺得很棒
推 weiike:我可以偷推茱蒂勇敢復仇人這顆大遺珠嗎 嗚嗚～
→ paulik:去年女主角個人不太認同Ellen Page的入圍...
推 billloung:她會走向MERYL的路吧..應該很容易被提名
推 velspa:小q也愛女王啊？筆記…
→ paulik:今年競爭太激烈 除非電影斑節蝦大紅不然難度很高