看板 DFBSD_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
-On [20040913 18:42], Matthew Dillon (dillon@apollo.backplane.com) wrote: > That isn't necessarily meaningful, because GCC embeds a timestamp in the > binary. Which has nothing to do with the boot0/1/2 stuff, they don't get timestamped by (g)as. > You have to objdump -d the resulting binaries and compare the code rather > then just do a binary compare of the binaries. Why? You can just compare the boot2 resulting object files, it's not an ELF binary. It doesn't even have sections objdump could dump from. > In anycase, it sounds to me that you've munged your machine somehow and > that a full buildworld/installworld and make upgrade is in order to try > to clean it up. Sorry, I didn't even *had* a system to boot from. But that's ok, because I think you are confusing my issue with a bunch of others, I'm sure you're swamped in email. :) > If boot1 and boot2 are installed in the standard place, then it is > sufficient to type 'disklabel -B ad0s2'. You do not need to specify > -b and -s. Given all the issues I wanted to be explicit in my testing. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://ashemedai.deviantart.com/ http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/ Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors...