-On [20041001 09:02], Matthew Dillon (dillon@apollo.backplane.com) wrote:
> Isn't that a mod of a file in the FreeBSD ports? Meaning that we can't
> 'fix' it that way.
>
> It might be better to make our new patch conform to the old patch's
> use of -b for now.
OTOH, bending backwards to support FreeBSD ports structure is going a bit
against logic in my opinion.
Besides, we are tripping a lot more issues recently than just these simple
matters. We _do_ need to move to our own system slowly by now.
Yes, if we keep going under the FreeBSD banner with ports we build on a ton
more ports, but OTOH, fixes for DF will almost never truly tested if we rip
the FreeBSD name out and get stuff filtered upstream.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://ashemedai.deviantart.com/
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/
The riddle master himself lost the key to his own riddles one day, and
found it again at the bottom of his heart.