看板 DFBSD_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 2004-10-18, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote: > Here is a new patch set. I missed a case in cache_nlookup(). The other > patch will work but might still result in unnecessary vnlru process > wakeups. > > The hysteresis is designed such that in a heavily loaded system only 1 > out of 10 calls to the namecache will eat cpu cycles cleaning up negative > cache entries. ok, i've tested it. looks like the problem with vnlru is resolved. i see a lot of fun HL/LH like Oct 19 01:05:36 apocalypse kernel: HLHLH Oct 19 01:05:36 apocalypse kernel: LHLHL Oct 19 01:05:37 apocalypse kernel: HL Oct 19 01:05:45 apocalypse kernel: HLHLHL Oct 19 01:05:46 apocalypse kernel: HL Oct 19 01:05:46 apocalypse kernel: HLHL Oct 19 01:05:46 apocalypse kernel: HL and one Oct 19 01:13:40 apocalypse kernel: HLX but cvsup eats too much cpu, while updating - 75%-85%, but while fetching only new files only 5% of cpu. --