Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:
> Jeffrey Hsu skrev:
>
>> Now that we have IPFW2 working (or will soon) thanks to Gary Allan's
>> tracking down the problem with ethernet headers, I wouldn't mind
>> getting rid of IPFW1.
>
>
> But IPFW2 still uses natd right? It's a ridicilously bad design of a NAT
> system, it kills every mapping you have if you wanna load up a new config.
Please, let IPFW be there. Remove IPFW1, if anything.
--regards