看板 DFBSD_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Hi, > That would be a good argument for not including a DISABLE facility :-) > Sometimes simplicity is the better solution and features only add > confusion. I'd suggest I just start implementing checks rsp. on-the-fly merging of /etc/defaults/services and /etc/services. Once I'm familiar with the corresponding code, we could give whatever disable feature we want some second thoughts, but for now, I think it's best to leave it out. Anyway, if someone (let's call him "Matt") says, do it THIS WAY to disable entries, I won't regret. :) --j ----------------------------------------------------- who | grep -i blonde | talk; cd ~; wine; talk; touch; unzip; touch; strip; gasp; finger; gasp; mount; fsck; more; yes; gasp; umount; make clean; sleep