看板 DFBSD_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 11:52:51AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Joerg, what's up with that? We still want to support ntpdate > functionality from an RCNG perspective, it would simply call rdate > now instead of ntpdate. Use ntpd for that as well. It's the default behaviour when started via rc. > Shouldn't we add an 'rdate' RCNG script to replace the ntpdate script > you removed ? I changed the rpcbind script to depend on ntpd, which is correct behaviour. Joerg