看板 DFBSD_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:49:59 +0300 Hasso Tepper <hasso@estpak.ee> wrote: > Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > That's something I have never seen happening, even when I do > > have a high load of filesystem activity, discs running at 100% for > > extended periods while largeish trees get moved around. The system > > certainly gets sluggish under that kind of load but nowhere near as bad > > as that. > > My experience is comparable with corecode's experience. Even moderate IO > load makes my audio stutter, my prompts apps hang for some seconds time > to time etc. It's HAMMER + AHCI. It's not a conncurrent IO issue we Interesting because I'm using HAMMER + NATA, heavy IO load will make video playback stutter but I've yet to make audio stutter. Corecode - are you using NATA or AHCI ? > obviously have (due to lack of IO scheduler). Surprisingly my UFS + NATA > machine performs much better in this regard. Can you try HAMMER + NATA ? > Not to mention http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1502 which became > showstopper for DragonFly + HAMMER deploying for me. I have no nohistory mounts but I delete 5GB files fairly often with no ill effects on normal mounts. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/