Re: BTX Halted on X86_64 master

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig4D021350494E6F7C055A8B68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill Hacker wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
>> Well this is rather embarassing. This aint a 64bit processor. I bought=

>> this thing like half a year after I bought my AMD64 workstation and I =
had
>> assumed (Core Duo) would be 64 bit.
>>
>> Sorry.....
>>
>=20
> Odd, that. Just which specific CPU do you have? Mobility-something,
> perchance?
>=20
> Not only the Core-2, but the earlier Core-D had Intel's '64-bit
> extensions' (mostly) cross-licensed from AMD.
>=20
> My Core-D happily ran FreeBSD ADM64 (6.2 beta onward).
>=20
> Is DFLY that different?
>=20
> Bill

None of the Core Duo chips support EM64T. Are you perhaps confusing the
Pentium D with the Core Duo? Also, all Core Duo chips were mobile ones,
save for the Xeon ULV ("Sossaman"), which was for dual-socket servers
(short-lived though, as a couple of months later Woodcrest and friends
(Core 2-based) were released).
--=20
	Thomas E. Spanjaard
	[e-mail]
	[e-mail]


--------------enig4D021350494E6F7C055A8B68
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLJSoVAAoJEKE55rmjwpbTpmgIALhWFA5voCoxHpo9ajcWNVut
IAMl/jogECrfwJHeY+Ok8cnTWjPg+o5WJkJlCVpGhPKG4AUPwl0u12Aajv1eq8Oe
uqfgm7Ddc7coIcdOGtrKgxxx1Yw5Bn9H7C09Rn5L/xGpnVOPv8aAgJuPEy7RHKTi
NXnhzsmrj5+JKvrdIcdz1zbRyC5nKY2NcxUbV8/6c9bExUBmtJq6jQ0JKaI27Lqz
bguxEKq7OhEmYKaGZPH1NyWeaSxdG+W65ULbybD8kytY+Aj/x3qaiWTFX7vonoek
MCKNObDMi9juulVas1NLk4TSaQ34tu+m92CXlSsIaR42RctyQTJv2IC0UC1bvWg=
=CpDx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig4D021350494E6F7C055A8B68--