On Tue, January 12, 2010 12:26 am, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :
> :Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@auroraux.org> added the comment:
> :
> :Everything is detected on that machine and seems to be working fine, just
> :thought I would report the messages, they looked nasty.
> :
> :Cheers,
> :Edward.
>
> It's ok. What it is doing is probing for a port multiplier. The only
> way one can determine if a port multiplier is on the port is to
> probe target 15, and of course this will fail if there is no port
> multiplier.
Would it make sense to say "no port multiplier found" in that error
message? I feel like we've had a number of these "what does this
ultimately harmless error message mean?" posts lately.