看板 DFBSD_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:41:26PM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > Apparently a few hours of pbulk test can trigger this panic (this is > on x86_64 and the kernel is built from source as of 5347900e6). > As opposed to what KKASSERT claims, p->p_lock doesn't hold the non-zero > value in the frame 5: > : > (kgdb) fr 5 > #5 0xffffffff802989a1 in kern_wait (pid=<value optimized out>, > status=0xffffffe05e997a74, options=1528637672, rusage=0x0, > res=0xffffffe05e997b58) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exit.c:901 > 901 KKASSERT(p->p_lock == 0); > (kgdb) p p->p_lock > $1 = 0 After poking here and the, I think this KKASSERT() can simply go away as proc_remove_zombie() will wait for p->p_lock to drop to zero anyway. /* * Unlink the proc from its process group so that * the following operations won't lead to an * inconsistent state for processes running down * the zombie list. */ KKASSERT(p->p_lock == 0); proc_remove_zombie(p); leavepgrp(p);