On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:03:49 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:45:53PM -0800, Chris Pressey wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:30:53 +0100
> > Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:19:11PM -0800, Chris Pressey wrote:
> > > > OK, then s/4294967296/2147483648/ and s/2147483648/1073741824/
> > > > :)
> > > >
> > > > > Or think about sizeof(char[INT_MAX]) vs.
> > > > > sizeof(char[UINT_MAX]).
> > > >
> > > > I have... I fail to see how it changes my point.
> > >
> > > 2147483648 is not a signed int constant?
> >
> > So 1073741824 should be forced to be unsigned too? That doesn't
> > make sense.
>
> If you consider that sizeof() is intended to be a special function
> like thingy, it makes sense.
Not to me :)
A more pressing problem with this commit, I just found out courtesy of
'make buildworld', is that it needs to include <sys/types.h> or
otherwise define size_t first, though...
-Chris