-On [20050425 09:12], Joerg Sonnenberger (joerg@britannica.bec.de) wrote:
>I did this intentional, because there is offically no 2.96. That
>was an inofficial version from Red Hat and IIRC there was also a
>rebranded GCC 2.95 as 2.97. We don't want to mess with this IMO.
It doesn't harm us the least. And 'sides, the GCC docs are explicit in
mentioning the supported version and onward.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://ashemedai.deviantart.com/
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/
And the sun rises, and reflects in my eyes, as the tear hits the ground
with the rain...