On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Matthew Dillon
<dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
> ꀠWell, generally speaking we want to remove zalloc entirely so its a
> ꀠstep in the right direction there. 糍here's nothing about a knote that
> ꀠrequires a zone allocation anyhow.
>
> ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀭMatt
> ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠ嗰atthew Dillon
> ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀼdillon@backplane.com>
>
I mean I will be switching it to objcache, although it doesn't require
pool style allocation right now, so the current patch was/is fine.
http://evilprojects.net/dragonflybsd/patches/zalloc/
There are patches (at the above URL) getting rid of the majority of
the consumers of zalloc from GCI, I just haven't had time to bring
them in.
Sam