Here's a question... It looks like the wiki is working well to encourage
documentation additions. It's lowered the "cost of entry" relative to
using the FreeBSD docproj material.
Should we look at a "release cycle", similar to what's happening with the
software? i.e. declare a few weeks of typo-fixing, and then move the
documentation at that point into a separate copy, associated with that
release of DragonFly?
This way, documentation matches a particular release. This may become
more significant as more radical features get moved in... There's also
the bonus of regular cleanups for the docs.