> Should we look at a "release cycle", similar to what's happening with the
> software? i.e. declare a few weeks of typo-fixing, and then move the
> documentation at that point into a separate copy, associated with that
> release of DragonFly?
>
> This way, documentation matches a particular release. This may become
> more significant as more radical features get moved in... There's also
> the bonus of regular cleanups for the docs.
>
>
Wow great idea
I'm with you on this
--
Eduardo Tongson
<pornadmin.net/~tongson>