看板 DFBSD_kernel 關於我們 聯絡資訊
:Fixed the mixup with pidfile that was preventing kerberos5 from being :built after pidfile() was added to libutil. This could probably be done :right by redoing configure with the later libutil; configure does look :at this. However, I don't know the canonical method, other than just by :hand, of getting from autoconf contrib packages to the bmake system... : :Does noone else use kerberos? I've seen no complaints. : :-- Pete Maybe we should rename pidfile() in libutil to something else instead. It's a pretty aweful name for libutil to choose to use anyway! Maybe something like make_pidfile() ? Comments? From what I can tell there isn't much in our tree that actually uses it. -Matt