Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Heh, that would include moi, but I confess I don't really know what
> :would constitute a successful 'test'. What end-point are you looking
> :for?
> I think it's mostly a matter of things working just like they did
> before, except now /kernel happens to have convenient debug info in
> it.
Okay, my new /kernel is kernel.debug, and the new modules have the debug
symbols but the modules.old/* do not.
As I understand it, this is all correct per the new default -- so my
test was successful.