Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
> Sigh. OK, if you guys *REALLY* want CLOG in
> syslogd I guess it's ok, but I don't think it's going
> to help as much as you think it will.
While I don't have years and years of Unix experience,
alternating between a set of sizelimited logfiles does
seem like a better fit with the overall Unix way of things.
Shouldn't those daemons writing directly to syslog
be considered flawed and be changed to use the
proper C functions?
BTW, I'm waiting for my very own Soekris, :)
which too will run off compact flash.
/Jonas Sundstr闣. www.kirilla.com