David Rhodus wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:56:37 -0600, Robert Garrett <rg70@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>The recent removal of sysinstall, reminded me of a discussion that
>>basically stated the only consumer of libdisk was sysinstall.
>>I am doing a makworld now with libdisk disabled, and if everything is
>>clean will remove it, provided there are no objections.
>>
>>Robert Garrett
>>
>
>
> I think there are a few ports that make use of libdisk. Every now and
> then I even write a program that uses it too. Is there a compelling
> reason to remove it ?
>
is there a compelling reason to keep it in the base system? should be
the question. the reason it was put in there was ripped out.
Rob