Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Well, in this scenario A and B would not be doing the journaling, the NFS
> server would be doing the journaling. The act of journaling is not
> something you run independantly on N machines all sharing the same
> NFS based filesystem. That would never work.
Ah, ok. I thought that's what you were proposing -- journal on A and B.
I re-read your message, and you're proposing the journal itself to fly
over the TCP connection, not journaling locally for filesystems
connected over TCP.
This freaking cold I have makes reading and thinking difficult. :-)
Dave