Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> I'm going to nit on this.
> :>=20
> :> Using longjmp is evil. Period.
> :
> :Is that the only justification you have for your opinion?
> :
> :Greg
>
> The problem, Greg, is that when you use something like that in
> a large project you basically remove a large number of programmers
> from the set of programmers able to work, maintain, and extend your code.
>
> Your code is especially difficult to maintain. I'm not saying its bad,
<...>
A word from "the masses": this is completely justified -- developer's --
point of view. On the other hand: cleaning of the code per se gives
plenty of opportunities to break what's working. Like, reducing vinum
functionality (or breaking it), or having ipfw removed. Doesn't look good.