>> -CURRENT Will indicate a build based on the head of the CVS tree.
>
>Can we use EXPERIMENTAL instead of CURRENT? Semantically, it's more clear.
No it isn't... "experimental" suggests something untested that may or
may not be retained in future. I think most commits to CURRENT are
already tested and will not be backed out, only debugged. BSD users
know what "current" means. Or something like "DEVEL" may be
appropriate too.