Alex wrote:
> Short update:
>
> It turns out that ls is doing something ugly: it is retrieving the
> major and minor from the udev, which isn't constructed anymore from
> major and minor. What I will be doing is change ls to work properly
> and commit it later this afternoon together with another bunch of
> changes/fixes.
This is not something ugly, but something that has been used since
~forever. It might be questionable whether to use major()/minor() at
all now, but it exists nontheless. I think we shouldn't care too much
for now about how major/minor numbers look like.
cheers
simon
--
<3 the future +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
rock the past +++ space for low CHF NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \