Magnus Eriksson wrote:
> Just a suggestion. As I understand it, it is regarded as well designed,
> and crypto is not an area where you want to take chances with new
> inventions. (It happens to work well for my purposes too...)
totally forgot about this.. (have been essentially dead for 1y)
nice. there you go.
personally, I could care less about the interface.. just throwing a
shower-idea out there :)
but - if one were to work that into a devfs interface and munge the
userspace tools and I don't really see what is all together that much
different than what I mentioned..
there's really only 2 steps here:
1) key -> memory-keyblock : mapping : raw-disk-device
2) data <-> cipher <-> disk
not too convoluted really. the tough part is splicing it into the
kernel without crashing your computer :)