看板 DFBSD_kernel 關於我們 聯絡資訊
From what I have seen of NPF and how it is more in-line with some of DF's MP goals and is very neatly written for MP, I would say it would make a worthy PF successor. Yep, we have too many solutions for too small a team to maintain. -Ed. On 22 January 2011 11:09, <elekktretterr@exemail.com.au> wrote: > In my opinion, there should be only one packet filter/firewall in the > kernel, with multiple clients - PF client, IPFW client, ipfilter client. > People could write their own clients, and wouldn't have to touch the > kernel at all. > > Petr > > > -- -- Edward O'Callaghan http://www.auroraux.org/ eocallaghan at auroraux dot org --- ()ꀠascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠ- against microsoft attachments