看板 DFBSD_kernel 關於我們 聯絡資訊
I'm almost done with the design stage for the HAMMER2 filesystem and will soon begin coding. The basic design document is here: http://apollo.backplane.com/DFlyMisc/hammer2.txt Lots of tech-speak inside, attach heat sinks to your brain! I am going to caution that I expect it to take about a year to implement most of the features (including the clustering bits which will be fully integrated into the filesystem), and probably 2 years for it to reach production stability. HAMMER2 is not going to replace HAMMER1 any time soon. In addition, HAMMER2 is going to have two serious restrictions relative to other filesystems. (1) HAMMER2 will not support hardlinks. And (2) HAMMER2 has no physical way to resolve '..' and will depend on the operating system's namecache to handle '..' (which DragonFly's will). There are many reasons for these restrictions, but it mostly comes down to the complexity of cluster cache coherency and mirroring protocols (making hardlinks extremely difficult to implement) and support for writable snapshots (making inode_num->physical translations and parent pointers extremely difficult to implement). It's kind of a one-or-the-other problem. HAMMER2 will also do away with the PFS concept, and instead any subdirectory tree can be treated as a PFS and independently mirrored, and also account for space & inodes used. So HAMMER2 is going to have a lot of cluster-friendly features. A veritable ton, but in order to be able to implement those features in a reasonable time frame with a reasonably low degree of complexity I had to make the above two tradeoffs. -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com>