Re: HAMMER2 design in progress - 1-2 year time frame

On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 09:50:23 -0400
Justin Sherrill <[e-mail]> wrote:

> We have the minor disadvantage that just because a system is DragonFly
> doesn't mean that we won't support hardlinks (i.e. a hammer1 or ufs
> filesystem), so it may be difficult for 3rd-party software to tell
> what the correct behavior is.

	I think it would be more a matter for the sysadmin not to put
things that need hard links on HAMMER2 filesystems.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/