--20cf30563d5bbab05304ad7786e0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sep 21, 2011 1:27 PM, <elekktretterr@exemail.com.au> wrote:
> Should
> virtualbox be sufficient to install DragonFly in?
In general, recent 4.x versions of VirtualBox worked fine (on an OS X host)
with DFly, BUT: the USB part of VirtualBox works =E2=80=A6 intermittently, =
in my
experience, with any guest OSs. This might be OS X host specific, but I nee=
d
many attempts and the right direction of wind to attach a USB stick to the
guest, not the host.
I don't exactly know if QEMU has USB support, but it may be worth a try if
VirtualBox acts up. Generally speaking, QEMU tries less hard to be "clever"
in integrating with the host, at the cost of performance.
Good luck!
matthiasr
--20cf30563d5bbab05304ad7786e0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>On Sep 21, 2011 1:27 PM, <<a href=3D"mailto:elekktretterr@exemail.com=
..au">elekktretterr@exemail.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
> Should<br>
> virtualbox be sufficient to install DragonFly in?</p>
<p>In general, recent 4.x versions of VirtualBox worked fine (on an OS X ho=
st) with DFly, BUT: the USB part of VirtualBox works =E2=80=A6 intermittent=
ly, in my experience, with any guest OSs. This might be OS X host specific,=
but I need many attempts and the right direction of wind to attach a USB s=
tick to the guest, not the host.</p>
<p>I don't exactly know if QEMU has USB support, but it may be worth a =
try if VirtualBox acts up. Generally speaking, QEMU tries less hard to be &=
quot;clever" in integrating with the host, at the cost of performance.=
</p>
<p>Good luck!<br>
matthiasr<br>
</p>
--20cf30563d5bbab05304ad7786e0--