On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:33:42AM -0000, Andreas Hauser wrote:
> Btw, what is with the rest of the patches ?
> Joerg wanted to look at what NetBSD does.
> NetBSD has that nice template system for strto*.
> Other than that i think we should go along FreeBSD.
NetBSD using the code derived from Citrus. I'm currently investigating
the relative speed of both implementions, but I think I prefer the NetBSD
version, because I'd like the include e.g. the iconv(3) support anyway.
Joerg