On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:24:52PM -0800, Chris Pressey wrote:
> 2. It seems GCC accepts
> int foo(__unused int arg)
> just as easily as
> int foo(int arg __unused)
> I've been using the first version, this patch uses the
> second version, and style(9) is silent on the issue.
> Does the DragonFly community have a preference?
int foo(int arg __unused)
The __unused is an optional "argument", it should go last.
Joerg