On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:16:59AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> That's one of the major features of the new namecache code. The old
> namecache code was purely advisory... in fact, VFS's could bypass it
> (and did). The new namecache code is fully integrated, mandatory,
> separated from the vnode algorithms, and cannot be bypassed.
Do we still have to mess with the vnode in kern_chroot? Can we use
the namespace entry of the new root directly for fdp->fd_rdir?
Joerg