看板 DFBSD_submit 關於我們 聯絡資訊
: :On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:01:33AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: :> * Implement a passive IPI message that does not signal the target cpu :> at all. The target cpu will process the message the next time it :> polls the queue (no less often then once a tick). Adjust the :> slab free() code to use this new API when freeing blocks owned by :> a different cpu. Such messages have huge target latencies (obviously) :> but cost virtually nothing on either the originating or target cpus :> because no hardware IPI is generated for the message. : :How does this affect low memory situations? : :Joerg It wouldn't have any effect at all. -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com>