Re: three kernel patches for review

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 
>     On #3 ... that doesn't look so reasonable.  I suppose on a machine with
>     huge amounts of memory one might want such a mechanism, but frankly if
>     memory is bad (especially if it is ECC'd memory), the only correct
>     solution is to replace it.  
> 
>     So I would say 'no' on the badram patch, at least for now.
> 

I don't think it is only for bad ram. :-)
some BIOS is bad enough that a space is I/O space but it lies that
it is ram and could be used, too bad.

> 					-Matt
> 					Matthew Dillon 
> 					<[e-mail]>

Cheers,

David Xu