Re: [issue1615] Clean up bind commit to master, revert to vendor

[e-mail] wrote:
> Zitat von "Simon 'corecode' Schubert (via DragonFly issue tracker)" 
> <[e-mail]>:
> 
>>
>> Yes, we should decide.  But both should be on the same branch, for
>> coherency.
>>
>> Reasons for master:
>> - those files don't belong to the tar ball
>>
>> Reasons for vendor branch:
>> - the READMEs describe the files (and what was removed) of the tar ball
>>
>> I don't mind either, just coherency.  I propose to decide on what goes
>> where first, and after that do the import.  Or at least pack both files
>> into the same branch.
> 
> According to development(7) both should go on master:
> "Now you are free to change the sources in contrib/foo, since you are back
> on the master branch.  The first thing to do is to add README.DRAGONFLY
> and README.DELETED."

Well, that's what I wrote.  However if people think that it is better to 
put it on the vendor branch (and I can see reasons for that), then we 
should change it.

cheers
   simon