[分享] 國家地理頻道對於數位影像修圖的看法

[CheerC (Walk on My Way)]

這陣子好像看到一些關於攝影比賽造假、修過頭得獎的文章，

先不論這些新聞報導內容以及事實如何。

想跟大家分享的是

小弟剛好最近看到了國家地理頻道網站上

對於數位照片修圖的這件事 有一些要求

我自己還滿喜歡的 打算以後 follow 他們的要求

因為我比較喜歡照片呈現出來的感覺

跟我當時看到的感覺不會相差太多

以下原文引自：http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/your-shot/manipulation

給大家參考一下

(小弟英文程度剛好可以看懂內容 就不便翻譯了 QQ)

I encourage you to submit photographs that are real. The world is already
full of visual artifice, and we aren't running Your Shot to add to it. We
want to see the world through your eyes, not the tools of Photoshop.

(總之，他們希望照片是真實的！)

Please do not digitally enhance or alter your photographs (beyond the basics
needed to achieve realistic color balance and sharpness). If you have
digitally added or removed anything, please don't submit the shot. We look at
every photo to see if it's authentic, and if we find that yours is in any way
deceptive, we'll disqualify it.

DODGING AND BURNING: Dodging (to brighten shadows) or burning (to darken
highlights) is OK, but it should be minimal. Do not overdo it. Your goal in
using digital darkroom techniques should be only to adjust the dynamic tonal
range of an image so that it more closely resembles what you saw. And don't
oversaturate the color.

SOLARIZATION, MEZZOTINT, DUOTONE, ETC.: No. If you use one of the myriad
alteration "filters" available in your digital photo software, please stop.

BLACK-AND-WHITE IMAGES: OK.

HAND-TINTED IMAGES: OK, but only if you're experienced in this art.

CROPPING: OK, if it makes the photo better.

STITCHED PANORAMAS: OK, but only if the segments were all made within the
same time frame. We don't want panoramas with sections made at significantly
different times. Do not change focal length when you create a stitched image.
Do not stretch the meaning of panorama to include elements that weren't in
the scene as you saw it. If your entry is a stitched image, please indicate
this in the caption. (A stitched panorama is created from multiple images,
each taking in a different angle of view from the same position, then
combined using digital techniques. It results in a wider view than can be
achieved with most wide-angle lenses.)

FISH-EYE LENSES: OK, but enter at your own risk - editors tend to dislike
such optical gimmicks.

HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGES (HDRI): OK, but like panoramas, only if the
combined parts are made at about the same time. We don't want final images
where the foreground was shot at noon and the sky at sunset. If your entry is
an HDRI image, please indicate this in the caption. (An HDRI image is created
from multiple images of exactly the same scene, made rapidly but at different
exposures, then combined using digital darkroom techniques. The final image,
when done successfully, allows one exposure for shadows to be combined with
another for highlights to produce a final image that has a greater dynamic
range than is possible with a single exposure.)

--

Edited by CheerC
Blog: http://cheerc.blogspot.com
Album: http://www.cheerc.idv.tw
500px: http://500px.com/cheerc

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 140.115.155.57
推 nctufish:這些標準其實蠻實在的，不失"攝影"本質又能接受適度後製
推 pirrysal:同意
推 pnpncat:國家地理有它的標準  那是根據他的媒體性質而決定的  但是
→ pnpncat:攝影者其實不用為此受限  我認為怎樣程度的修圖都是合理的
→ pnpncat:只要照片傳達出來的是當下真實的感受即可  光學正確只是
→ pnpncat:次要的東西  孟克的「吶喊」在光學上也是錯誤的  但他在情
→ pnpncat:感上比一張光學正確的照片還真實
→ pnpncat:投稿  評比相機  參加不能修圖的比賽  這些情況當然要遵守
→ pnpncat:規則  但若是純論攝影  修圖恐懼症其實比過度修圖還病態
推 archon:後製也是創作的一部份呀... ^^;
→ pnpncat:當然囉  不過國家地理的理念本來就是把世界各地「景象」帶
→ pnpncat:給大眾看見  所以會訂下一些規則  它畢竟不是藝術雜誌
推 piliwu:他們家的標準比較實際,我大概常用的就這些
→ piliwu:沒修圖不代表照片就是真實的,把眼睛閉上回憶一下然後跟照片
→ piliwu:比較,你就會發現相機直出常常本身就不真實
→ piliwu:魚眼不愛的原因其實很簡單,變形非常嚴重,就算拉回來也是
推 darren8221:為什麼不愛魚眼呢，因為那不是正常人會看到的東西啊！
推 Laviathan:可能就是因為不是正常人會看到的東西吧
推 ginnietulip:從負片暗房學起 以相紙交稿就會懂 銀鹽若不是通過你
→ ginnietulip:就毫無價值 除非你也不認得自己的底片