Re: [空想] 幹麻一直滿嘴氫彈核彈的

[MRZ (臺大歷史系教授......Orz)]

※ 引述《goetz (雖九死其猶未悔)》之銘言：
: 不過說到這，我忽然間有一個很大的疑問:
: 美軍丟在廣島的原子彈是刻意要殺傷平民的吧?
: 要不然，為什麼不把原子彈直接丟在第二總軍軍部的頭上?
: 以戰略效果而言，把火田俊六變成飛灰和把廣島市變飛灰，哪個比較好呢?
: 這點請教一下...

From " Atomic Bomb: Decision — Target Committee, May 10–11, 1945.
Retrieved on August 6, 2005."

The Target Committee at Los Alamos on May 10–11, 1945,
recommended Kyoto, Hiroshima, Yokohama, and the arsenal
            ^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^
at Kokura as possible targets. The committee rejected the
   ^^^^^^                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
use of the weapon against a strictly military objective
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
because of the chance of missing a small target not surrounded
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
by a larger urban area. The psychological effects on Japan were
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
of great importance to the committee members. They also agreed
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
that the initial use of the weapon should be sufficiently
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
spectacular for its importance to be internationally recognized.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The committee felt Kyoto, as an intellectual center of Japan,
had a population "better able to appreciate the significance
of the weapon." Hiroshima was chosen because of its large size,
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
its being "an important army depot" and the potential that the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
bomb would cause greater destruction because the city was
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
surrounded by hills which would have a "focusing effect".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

然後有人反對把京都當首選,也認為轟炸橫濱的話,要是丟錯了怎麼辦?況且
東京被轟炸了很多次,找轟炸過的地點作示範,日本軍方可能會擺爛.既然當
時沒有smart bomb,那麼老百姓就只好倒楣.

所以下一個被挑上的就是廣島跟小倉,但那天因為天候關係,小倉逃過一劫.

--
http://gps.wolflord.com/
歡迎大家參觀

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 218.170.7.70
推 slcgboy:到不是 是丟到天皇 日本人真的會跟妳戰到最後一人= =
→ slcgboy:既然丟不準= = 那不如換個安全又高CP值得地方
→ slcgboy:丟錯就真的打不完 還得打登陸戰 想想 這消耗太大了!!!
推 ThomasJP:其實根本不需要登陸...擺著到柏林危機之前日本就滅國了
推 paulyung:反對京都是一個美軍准將，戰前去過京都，認為京都文化應
→ paulyung:該保存而反對。
推 Transfinite:這就叫偽善嗎-_-
推 MRZ:怎麼會是偽善?保存人家的古蹟文化叫做偽善,那我還真支持這種人
推 Caesar0712:不是梁思成建議不要丟京都的嗎?