Re: [問題] 為什麼國軍產生不了岳飛

[innominate (innominate)]

※ 引述《plamc (普蘭可)》之銘言：
: → innominate:你先給我投資的定義吧                                 11/09 00:08
: → zeumax:因為自認投機者通常看重風險。而自認投資者常常看重報酬。   11/09 00:10
: → seaping:經濟學, 財務管理的教科書上都有,找時間翻一下不難的       11/09 00:14
: → seaping:或是維基也有, 投資與投機的定義與差異早就都定義的很清楚  11/09 00:15

教科書...

我引先賢Bernard Baruch的一段文字
(當然你要嗆Baruch搞不懂甚麼叫投機...我也沒話說,這年頭鍵盤投資大師很多,不意外)

Modern usage has made the term "speculator" a synonym for gambler and plunger.
Actually the word comes from the Latin speculari, which means to spy out and
observe.

I have defined a speculator as a man who observes the future and acts before
it occurs. To be able to do this successfully - and it is an ability of
priceless value in all human affairs, including the making of peace and war
- three things are necessary:

First, one must get the facts of a situation or problem.
Second, one must form a judgment as to what those facts portend.
Third, one must act in time - before it is too late.

I have heard many men talk intelligently, even brilliantly, about something
- only to see them proven powerless when it comes to acting on what they believe.


甚麼叫投機?
我想你可能先從原拉丁文的涵義去了解才適當

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 175.181.110.143
※ 編輯: innominate      來自: 175.181.110.143      (11/09 00:29)
推 schinshikss:所以說，成功的投機必然是內線交易(大誤)
哈,那也要內線交易不是別人表你...XD

推 seaping:我想你誤會了, 我不是什麼投資大師,只是個小小書蟲而已
我很期待你出來打Baruch的臉,快

推 seaping:沒必要啊, 經濟學和財務分析都已經過了無數學者長久歷史的
有料就出來說Baruch說的都是放屁,我無所謂的 XD

→ seaping:淬鍊, 緊抱或緊咬著其中一位名家的話語都易流於偏頗
→ seaping:所以才會說去讀教科書, 反樸歸真並沒有什麼不好的..
很可惜的是,在所謂的投資/投機市場,只會讀教科書是不會讓你成為贏家的
而且若要談反璞歸真,應該要回到投機的拉丁本意才對

→ seaping:總之我得去睡了, 言盡於此, 晚安囉...
→ KevinR:好偏頗
你也好歹多打幾個字,看是說Baruch其實沒料之類的
只打三個字一點誠意都沒有
※ 編輯: innominate      來自: 175.181.110.143      (11/09 18:23)